no shit
category: PhD sources
tags: ,

Waisbren propagates a pull-model instead of the actual push-model. He probably means that distributors are closer to consumers than producers, which is correct. But I think he does not mean a real consumer-driven model. I think he means distributors should work the way they always did, and that means “we think we know what the consumer wants.”

“Waisbren illustrated what he called the “normalised film finance paradigm” – the source material and who is attached creates “a demand pull by the distributor and that creates the capital to make the movie. During the recent boom years, this model changed. Finance became available even for films that “didn’t have a distribution solution locked up”. The result was a glut of specialty movies. Now, that glut is bound to end.
“It doesn’t mean that speciality films won’t be made but the gatekeeper is going to be the distributor and his economic projections (will matter) much more than the hedge fund saying ‘I want to be in the movie business’.”"

Screen Daily ~ Waisbren – Don’t hesitate – consolidate! (17.02.2009)

A short history of TheWB.

Josh Schwartz (creator of The O.C. and Gossip Girl) is about to release an original web series called Rockville, CA. on March 16.
He introduces a different band every episode and “expects to tie in the series to live concert appearances by the band.”

NY Times ~ Resurrecting the WB as a Web Contender

As described on www.trendwatching.com it is possible to start online and end up in the real (old) world (OFF=ON), or at least PINK is thinking about it.

www.trendwatching.com
PINK The Series Blog ~ Graphic Novel

category: PhD sources
tags: ,

A short history of the failure of Pop.com, a project by Dreamworks and Imagine Entertainment which was supposed to stream short films in 2000, long before YouTube.

It had huge stars on board.

But it was supposed to be Dreamworks-only content and people were too busy to deliver. Later on they decided to accept short films from aspiring filmmakers.

Then the dot com bubble burst and they couldn’t raise more money.

They wanted to collaborate with AtomFilms, who were not interested and finally it was shut down.

Business Week ~ What Burst Pop.com’s Bubble (13.02.2009)

category: PhD sources
tags: ,

Success story of an indie film maker, who wasn’t able to refinance his film although he was fairly successful at festivals. He only sold 2,000 DVDs in 2 years. Then he uploaded the film on YouTube and sold 4,000 DVDs in one year, had 530.000 views, and made an advertising partnership with a start-up Web site which brought in another $15,000.

Four Eyed Monsters is the first example of how YouTube actively tried to go that way.

“Project:Direct” was YouTube’s next project about short films. The winner was flown to Sundance by Hewlett Packard.

“YouTube streaming could actually stimulate DVD sales, pointing to the experience of Monty Python’s distributors, who posted dozens of television segments last year and soon saw its DVD boxed set shoot to No. 2 on Amazon.com’s movies and television bestseller list.”

YouTube’s content partnership head Jordan Hoffner: “”We have no schedule, unlimited shelf space and amazing data about the audience.” Not a bad pitch. Will anyone bite? We’ll see.”

YouTube goes Hollywood
10 MPH
Four Eyed Monsters

A short history of Hulu, why it succeeded and why everybody was sceptical about it: “Asking two incumbents to work together to create a disruptive business seemed like a recipe for disaster.”

“Last March, Innosight said that if Hulu was to succeed, it must forget the lessons of its core businesses. Seems as if it forgot those lessons.”
Basically they are arguing that Hulu only succeeded, because the parent companies NBC Universal and News Corp. allowed Hulu not to care about their existing business models. Furthermore an external CEO was chosen who then chose external staff.

But Hulu still uses their “old” model of offering good content and selling ads. Only they are selling far less and cheaper ads than the parents.

Now the advertisement-market is collapsing and Hulu is losing its business model. It has to forget even more.

Therefore Hulu should forget even more and find really new ways of making money.

Hulu Is A Big Hit

Statistics about cinema in France in 2008.

Nearly like the golden ages of cinema!

Very one-sided. Everything is perfect. Does not show that cinema attendance was actually higher in 2004. Perhaps because in 2004 the US-share was higher than the French one?

Statistics about cinema in France in 2008.

Nearly like the golden ages of cinema!