<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Woi Woi &#187; IP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woitek.org/tag/ip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woitek.org</link>
	<description>no shit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 05:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lessig, L ~ Remix</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/lessig-l-remix</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/lessig-l-remix#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lessig, Lawrence 2008 Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy 24f &#8220;&#8216;When I was a boy &#8230; in front of every house in the summer evenings you would find young people together singing the songs of the day or the old songs. Today you hear these infernal machines going night and day. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lessig, Lawrence<br />
2008<br />
<em>Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy</em></p>
<p>24f<br />
&#8220;&#8216;When I was a boy &#8230; in front of every house in the summer evenings you would find young people together singing the songs of the day or the old songs. Today you hear these infernal machines going night and day. We will not have a vocal cord left. The vocal cords will be eliminated by a process of evolution, as was the tail of man when he came from the ape.&#8217;&#8221; He quotes somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/lessig-l-remix/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vaidhyanathan, S ~ Copyrights and Copywrongs</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/vaidhyanathan-s-copyrights-and-copywrongs</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/vaidhyanathan-s-copyrights-and-copywrongs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaidhyanathan, Siva 2003 Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity The 2001 version is identical with the 2003 version, even page numbers are the same, except for the additional afterword or something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaidhyanathan, Siva<br />
2003<br />
<em>Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity</em></p>
<p>The 2001 version is identical with the 2003 version, even page numbers are the same, except for the additional afterword or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/vaidhyanathan-s-copyrights-and-copywrongs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gayer, A et al ~ Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Era</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/gayer-a-et-al-copyright-enforcement-in-the-digital-era</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/gayer-a-et-al-copyright-enforcement-in-the-digital-era#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gayer, Amit Shy, Oz 2006 Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Era in Illing, G et al ~ Industrial Organization and the Digital Economy Economists can&#8217;t decide whether file sharing has a negative influence on the music industry or artists or not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gayer, Amit<br />
Shy, Oz<br />
2006<br />
<em>Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Era</em> in Illing, G et al ~ <em>Industrial Organization and the Digital Economy</em></p>
<p>Economists can&#8217;t decide whether file sharing has a negative influence on the music industry or artists or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/gayer-a-et-al-copyright-enforcement-in-the-digital-era/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiler, P. C. 2002. Entertainment, Media, and the Law</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/weiler-p-c-2002-entertainment-media-and-the-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/weiler-p-c-2002-entertainment-media-and-the-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weiler, Paul C. 2002 Entertainment, Media, and the Law: Text, Cases, Problems 2 &#8220;Entertainment is a human activity and economic venture. Its internal relationships and products are, of course, shaped by contract, as well as constitutional, copyright, labor, antitrust, and trade law. Yet every one of those branches of the law applies to other industries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weiler, Paul C.<br />
2002<br />
<em>Entertainment, Media, and the Law: Text, Cases, Problems</em></p>
<p>2<br />
&#8220;Entertainment is a human activity and economic venture. Its internal relationships and products are, of course, shaped by contract, as well as constitutional, copyright, labor, antitrust, and trade law. Yet every one of those branches of the law applies to other industries &#8211; to auto manufacturing for example. Professors do not, however, teach and write books about &#8216;automobile law&#8217;. <strong>What is distinctive about entertainment law is the unique way that many crucial features of this industry have shaped and been shaped by the legal system.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/weiler-p-c-2002-entertainment-media-and-the-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brodesser-Akner, C ~ The New Halo Game Is a Hit</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/brodesser-akner-c-the-new-halo-game-is-a-hit</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/brodesser-akner-c-the-new-halo-game-is-a-hit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brodesser-Akner, Claude 06.10.2010 The New Halo Game Is a Hit — So What’s the Status of the Halo Movie? (30.11.2010) History of the Halo movie that never happened. Including financing, which studios, Peter Jackson, Neil Blomkamp, Steven Spielberg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brodesser-Akner, Claude<br />
06.10.2010<br />
<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/10/the_new_halo_video_game_is_a_h.html"><em>The New Halo Game Is a Hit — So What’s the Status of the Halo Movie?</em></a> (30.11.2010)</p>
<p>History of the Halo movie that never happened. Including financing, which studios, Peter Jackson, Neil Blomkamp, Steven Spielberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/brodesser-akner-c-the-new-halo-game-is-a-hit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Government ~ Franchising Code of Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/australian-government-franchising-code-of-conduct</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/australian-government-franchising-code-of-conduct#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian Government 2010 Franchising Code of Conduct Australian law concerning Franchising.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australian Government<br />
2010<br />
<em>Franchising Code of Conduct</em></p>
<p><strong>Australian</strong> law concerning <strong>Franchising</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/australian-government-franchising-code-of-conduct/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC ~ Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/ftc-disclosure-requirements-and-prohibitions-concerning-franchising</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/ftc-disclosure-requirements-and-prohibitions-concerning-franchising#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission 2007 Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunities; Final Rule The federal laws concerning franchising in the USA. There are also state-level laws.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Trade Commission<br />
2007<br />
<em>Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunities; Final Rule</em></p>
<p>The federal laws concerning <strong>franchising in the USA</strong>.</p>
<p>There are also <strong>state-level laws</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/ftc-disclosure-requirements-and-prohibitions-concerning-franchising/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hon, A ~ Alternate Reality Games and Perplex City Season 2</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/hon-a-alternate-reality-games-and-perplex-city-season-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/hon-a-alternate-reality-games-and-perplex-city-season-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conceptual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hon, Adrian 2007 Alternate Reality Games and Perplex City Season 2 (11.05.2010) 17:54 Definition-story arc: &#8220;analogous to chapter in a novel&#8221; -> so in his terminology arcs cannot overlap? -> Not my understanding of story arcs. 19:48 They started off with influencable stories that branched out, were complicated, and depended on how the audience interacted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hon, Adrian<br />
2007<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtY-ifssEKY"><em>Alternate Reality Games and Perplex City Season 2</em></a> (11.05.2010)</p>
<p>17:54<br />
Definition-story arc:<br />
&#8220;analogous to chapter in a novel&#8221; -> so in his terminology arcs cannot overlap? -> Not my understanding of story arcs.<br />
<div id="attachment_1306" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 330px"><a href="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Hon-A-ARGs-and-Perplex-City-Season-2-17min.png"><img src="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Hon-A-ARGs-and-Perplex-City-Season-2-17min.png" alt="" title="Hon, A ~ ARGs and Perplex City Season 2 17min" width="320" height="240" class="size-full wp-image-1306" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Story Arcs</p></div></p>
<p>19:48<br />
They started off with influencable stories that branched out, were complicated, and depended on how the audience interacted with them. Later on the stories became much more linear, because these a easier to play. &#8220;Leave the story to us&#8230; but we&#8217;ll still change it anyway.&#8221; (slide text) if the audience likes a character, for example -> not player-directed but player-influenced story.</p>
<p>20:16<br />
People like seeing new websites/content.</p>
<p>ARGs require new skill sets -> everything has to happen faster -> storytellers work under a constant deadline -> they&#8217;re not used to that, have to adapt</p>
<p>30:48<br />
<strong>Mind Candy didn&#8217;t create a storyworld bible, but the audience created a Wiki and a Google Maps mashup that became the de facto bible!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/hon-a-alternate-reality-games-and-perplex-city-season-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNESCO ~ The ABC of Copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/unesco-the-abc-of-copyright</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/unesco-the-abc-of-copyright#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=1113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UNESCO 2010 The ABC of Copyright (23.06.2010) Throughout the document: common law = anglo-american countries civil law traditoin = European continent All lists are verbatim quotes. Copyright concerning film: page 28. 9 Copyright Central role in culture and communication Intrinsically linked to technological advances Challenged by rampant piracy in many countries 10 The Essences of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNESCO<br />
2010<br />
<a href="http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/diversity/pdf/WAPO/ABC_Copyright_en.pdf"><em>The ABC of Copyright</em></a> (23.06.2010)</p>
<p>Throughout the document:<br />
common law = anglo-american countries<br />
civil law traditoin = European continent</p>
<p>All lists are verbatim quotes.</p>
<p>Copyright concerning film: page 28.</p>
<p>9<br />
Copyright</p>
<ul>
<li>Central role in culture and communication</li>
<li>Intrinsically linked to technological advances</li>
<li>Challenged by rampant piracy in many countries</li>
</ul>
<p>10<br />
The Essences of Copyright</p>
<ul>
<li>Right of ownership in creative works</li>
<li>Protection against unauthorized uses</li>
<li>Limitations for the benefit of society at large</li>
</ul>
<p>11<br />
The Rationale behind Copyright</p>
<ul>
<li>Exclusive rights as economic reward and stimulus for creativity</li>
<li>Natural/personal right in the results of intellectual work</li>
<li>Distinction between Anglo-American (common Law) and Continental (civil law) tradition</li>
</ul>
<p>12<br />
The Origins of Copyright</p>
<ul>
<li>From the earliest days some forms of protection -> in ancient Greece it was a dishonour to copy</li>
<li>15th-century Europe: Invention of the printing press</li>
<li>Printing privileges precursors of modern copyright laws</li>
</ul>
<p>The First Copyright Laws</p>
<ul>
<li>1710: Statute of Queen Anne (England)</li>
<li>1791 and 1793: Revolutionary decrees (France) -> introduction of public domain</li>
<li>By the mid-19th century: followed by many countries</li>
</ul>
<p>13<br />
The Modern Copyright System</p>
<ul>
<li>Marked by the conclusion of international agreements</li>
<li>Cross-border trade and technological advances as motor</li>
<li>Information society requires further global co-operation</li>
</ul>
<p>16<br />
The Scope of Copyright Protection</p>
<ul>
<li>Copyright protects &#8216;works of a literary, scientific or artistic nature’</li>
<li>Works must be original and more than mere ideas</li>
<li>Trend towards extension of scope in recent years</li>
</ul>
<p>17<br />
The Idea-Expression Dichotomy</p>
<ul>
<li>Copyright requires an expression in a particular form</li>
<li>No protection of underlying ideas, mere information or style</li>
<li>Usually non-exhaustive list of examples provided by copyright laws</li>
</ul>
<p>-> Ideas can be copied freelly, &#8220;the form in which the ideas are expressed&#8221; (page 16) cannot.</p>
<p>18<br />
The Originality Criteria in Copyright Law</p>
<ul>
<li>Central requirement of originality to be interpreted by courts</li>
<li>Form, purpose, quality, novelty, artistic merit or commercial value not relevant</li>
<li>Derivative works protected like original works</li>
</ul>
<p>19<br />
Absence of Formalities in Copyright Law</p>
<ul>
<li>Absence of formalities enshrined in international conventions</li>
<li>© symbol introduced by the Universal Copyright Convention (1952)</li>
<li>Voluntary registration may serve as prima facie evidence</li>
</ul>
<p>Fixation Requirement in Copyright</p>
<ul>
<li>Fixation ≠ registration; necessity depends on national legislation</li>
<li>Concerns ephemeral or improvised works (e.g. music, speeches, choreographies)</li>
<li>Decisive for the starting point of protection</li>
</ul>
<p>-> common law: work must be fixed by any tangible, material means<br />
-> civil law: copyright takes effect from the very moment it is created</p>
<p>20<br />
The Protection of Computer Programs</p>
<ul>
<li>Includes applications and operating systems alike</li>
<li>Applies to both source code and object code</li>
<li>Form of embodiment (stored/written) irreleva[nt]</li>
</ul>
<p>21<br />
Protection of Databases</p>
<ul>
<li>‘Original’ databases: protected as compilation by reason of structure</li>
<li>Sui generis protection of contents of non-original databases</li>
</ul>
<p>-> the database structure is protected everywhere, the content not necessarily</p>
<p>Traditional Cultural Expressions and Folklore</p>
<ul>
<li>Form part of the culture from which they originate</li>
<li>Impersonal/collective nature at odds with individual property rights</li>
<li>New forms of protection explored by UNESCO or others</li>
</ul>
<p>24<br />
Copyright Ownership</p>
<ul>
<li>Initial ownership generally vested in authors</li>
<li>Certain exceptions in particular cases</li>
<li>Copyright transferable after death or by contracts</li>
</ul>
<p>Who is the ‘Author’?</p>
<ul>
<li>Primarily the natural person who created the work</li>
<li>Common law: third parties may be deemed authors (ex: corporate bodies, legal entities)</li>
<li>Civil law tradition: no author apart from the creator</li>
</ul>
<p>25<br />
Works made for hire</p>
<ul>
<li>Works produced in the course of employment</li>
<li>Common law: copyright initially vested in employer instead of employee</li>
<li>Civil law: employer can acquire copyright via contract</li>
</ul>
<p>Copyright in Anonymous and Pseudonymous Works</p>
<ul>
<li>Legal presumption in favour of publishers</li>
<li>Valid until the author reveals his or her identity</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;the publisher is not the real owner of copyright but is only entitled to protect and enforce the author’s rights&#8221;</p>
<p>27<br />
<div id="attachment_1121" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/UNESCO-ABC-page-271.jpg"><img src="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/UNESCO-ABC-page-271-300x176.jpg" alt="Works Created by Several Persons" title="Works Created by Several Persons" width="300" height="176" class="size-medium wp-image-1121" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Works Created by Several Persons</p></div></p>
<p>28<br />
Rights Ownership in Cinematographic Works</p>
<ul>
<li>Civil laws approach: films as joint or composite works, several right owners</li>
<li>Common law approach: producer typically sole copyright owner</li>
</ul>
<p>30<br />
Concerns the author&#8217;s non-financial interests</p>
<ul>
<li>Recognized in most countries in different ways</li>
<li>Recognition required by international law</li>
</ul>
<p>The Most Important Moral Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Right of attribution (authorship)</li>
<li>Right of integrity</li>
<li>Right of disclosure</li>
<li>Right of withdrawal</li>
</ul>
<p>31<br />
Development of International Recognition</p>
<ul>
<li>Originally characteristic of civil law systems</li>
<li>Art. 6bis Berne Convention / 1996 WIPO Treaties</li>
<li>Implementation outside copyright possible -> tort or contract law for example</li>
</ul>
<p>32<br />
Basic Features of Moral Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Exist independently from economic rights</li>
<li>Generally not assignable -> cannot be transferred to someone else</li>
<li>Last at least as long as economic rights</li>
</ul>
<p>33<br />
The Right of Attribution</p>
<ul>
<li>Right to claim authorship in a work</li>
<li>≠ Right against wrongful attribution -> part of personality rights</li>
</ul>
<p>34<br />
The Right of Integrity -> &#8216;The Right to Respect&#8217;</p>
<ul>
<li>Right to prevent derogatory use of the work</li>
<li>Takes into account both content and context</li>
<li>Exercise often subject to balance of interests</li>
</ul>
<p>The Right of Disclosure</p>
<ul>
<li>Relates to making the work publicly known</li>
<li>Work may not be divulged despite contract</li>
<li>Requires divulgation beyond the private circle</li>
</ul>
<p>35<br />
The Right to Withdraw</p>
<ul>
<li>The author may withdraw the work after a change of ideas</li>
<li>Subject to conditions to protect third parties</li>
</ul>
<p>38<br />
Economic Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Exclusive rights and remuneration rights</li>
<li>Usually a bundle of prerogatives corresponding to different uses</li>
<li>Minimum standards guaranteed by international treaties</li>
</ul>
<p>39<br />
Most Important Economic Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Right of Reproduction</li>
<li>Right of Distribution</li>
<li>Rental and Lending Rights</li>
<li>Rights of Communication to the Public (incl. Right of Making Available)</li>
<li>Droit de suite (Resale Right)</li>
<li>Adaptation Right (incl. Translation)</li>
</ul>
<p>The Right of Reproduction</p>
<ul>
<li>Right to authorize the making of copies</li>
<li>Covers all methods known or yet to be discovered</li>
<li>Includes storage in digital form (except transient acts -> caching, temp files)</li>
</ul>
<p>40<br />
The Right of Distribution</p>
<ul>
<li>Right to disseminate physical copies</li>
<li>Subject to national, regional or world-wide exhaustion</li>
</ul>
<p>41<br />
Rental and Lending Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Address successive uses by multiple users</li>
<li>Rental: exclusive right</li>
<li>Lending: entitles authors to an equitable remuneration</li>
</ul>
<p>42<br />
The Rights of Communication to the Public</p>
<ul>
<li>Right of public presentation and performance (incl. small rights -> background music in bars and shops)</li>
<li>Broadcasting right</li>
<li>Rights of remote transmission by other means</li>
</ul>
<p>The Right of Making Available</p>
<ul>
<li>Aims at access from a place and at a time individually chosen</li>
<li>Technology-neutral and future-proof</li>
</ul>
<p>-> introduced with the Internet, but covers all future technologies</p>
<p>43<br />
The Resale Right (Droit de suite)</p>
<ul>
<li>Entitles visual artists to a share in the resale price of their works</li>
<li>Remuneration right rather than exclusive</li>
</ul>
<p>The Adaptation Right</p>
<ul>
<li>Exclusive right to authorize ‘derivative works’ (incl. translation)</li>
<li>Adaptation distinct from free use of ideas as source of inspiration</li>
<li>Author of adaptation has own copyright in the derivative work</li>
</ul>
<p>45<br />
Limitations to Copyright Protection</p>
<ul>
<li>Protection expires after a limited time</li>
<li>Exceptions for certain legitimate uses</li>
<li>Non-voluntary licences</li>
</ul>
<p>46<br />
Term of Protection</p>
<ul>
<li>According to international law: at least 50 years after the death of the author</li>
<li>In some countries no time limit for moral rights</li>
</ul>
<p>47<br />
General Rules on Exceptions</p>
<ul>
<li>Basically four categories of legitimate interests</li>
<li>Concept and rules vary from one country to another</li>
<li>Strictly defined exceptions vs. wider concepts</li>
<li>Three-step test</li>
</ul>
<p>48<br />
Freedom of expression</p>
<ul>
<li>Secured through free flow of information</li>
<li>Of particular importance: right to quote</li>
</ul>
<p>49<br />
Access to Knowledge</p>
<ul>
<li>Exceptions in favour of educational institutions</li>
<li>Usually valid only for non-profit uses</li>
<li>Specific clauses for the benefit of handicapped persons</li>
</ul>
<p>Justice and Government</p>
<ul>
<li>Official texts often excluded from protection</li>
<li>Free use of protected material in courts</li>
</ul>
<p>50<br />
Private Copying</p>
<ul>
<li>Permitted in a number of countries</li>
<li>Usually framed by levy-based remuneration -> on the copying devices and bland media</li>
</ul>
<p>[L]imitations in the Digital Environment</p>
<ul>
<li>Right owners concern over enhanced quality of digital copies</li>
<li>TPM and application of limitations</li>
<li>Application subject to domestic law and courts</li>
</ul>
<p>53<br />
Transfer of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Contractual transfer inter vivos (during the author’s lifetime)</li>
<li>Transfer mortis causa (after the author’s death)</li>
</ul>
<p>54<br />
Contractual Transfer of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Concerns only economic rights; moral rights inalienable</li>
<li>Transfer of rights independent of ownership of the physical material</li>
<li>Two principal ways for rights transfer: assignment or licensing</li>
<li>Each right may be transferred or licensed separately</li>
</ul>
<p>55<br />
Transfer of Rights by Assignment</p>
<ul>
<li>Assignee becomes owner of the rights</li>
<li>Total or partial assignment possible</li>
<li>Typical of common law tradition</li>
</ul>
<p>56<br />
The Licensing of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Right owner maintains ownership</li>
<li>Permission for a specific use</li>
<li>Simple licences vs. exclusive licences -> &#8220;For the period for which it is granted, exclusive license has an effect comparable to a transfer of rights by assignment&#8221; (page 55)</li>
</ul>
<p>57<br />
Limitations on Transfer of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Protection of the author as typically weaker party</li>
<li>Rules concerning scope of transfer</li>
<li>Rules concerning proportionate remuneration</li>
</ul>
<p>Formal Requirements</p>
<ul>
<li>Usually written form of contract</li>
<li>Legal presumptions in some cases</li>
</ul>
<p>58<br />
Transfer of Rights After Death</p>
<ul>
<li>Economic rights: freely transferable</li>
<li>Moral rights: several models in different countries</li>
</ul>
<p>60<br />
Related Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Protect the results of certain activities mainly related to the dissemination of works</li>
</ul>
<p>The Most Important Related Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Performers&#8217; rights</li>
<li>Phonogram producers&#8217; rights</li>
<li>Broadcasters&#8217; rights</li>
</ul>
<p>61<br />
The Development of International Related Rights Protection</p>
<ul>
<li>The Rome Convention of 1961</li>
<li>The TRIPs Agreement of 1994</li>
<li>The 1996 WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty</li>
</ul>
<p>62<br />
The Characteristics of Related Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Covering a variety of heterogeneous subject matter</li>
<li>Terminology reflects personality-centred author’s rights approach</li>
<li>Protection similar to copyright albeit more limited</li>
</ul>
<p>63<br />
Protection of Performers’ Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>‘Performer’: usually one who performs works or expressions of folklore</li>
<li>Rights of reproduction, distribution, rental and making available</li>
<li>Moral rights of identification and integrity</li>
<li>Minimum term of protection 50 years under the WPPT</li>
</ul>
<p>64<br />
Protection of Phonogram Producers</p>
<ul>
<li>‘Phonogram’: Fixation of sounds of any kind on any medium</li>
<li>Rights of reproduction, rental, distribution and making available</li>
<li>Minimum term of protection: 50 years</li>
</ul>
<p>Protection of Broadcasters’ Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>‘Broadcast’: transmission of any sound or images by wireless means -> but often also cable</li>
<li>Rights of re-broadcasting, reproduction and communication to the public.</li>
<li>Minimum term of protection 20 years</li>
<li>Ongoing discussion on updating protection within WIPO</li>
</ul>
<p>67<br />
Enforcement of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Civil Remedies</li>
<li>Penal and Administrative Sanctions</li>
<li>Technological Protection Measures</li>
<li>Provisional and Border Measures</li>
</ul>
<p>68<br />
Forms of Rights Infringement</p>
<ul>
<li>Infringement of Economic Rights</li>
<li>Infringement of Moral Rights</li>
</ul>
<p>69<br />
Civil Remedies</p>
<ul>
<li>Injunction and seizure of infringing objects (no bad faith required)</li>
<li>Damages</li>
<li>Monetary compensation for moral suffering (in some countries)</li>
</ul>
<p>Penal Sanctions</p>
<ul>
<li>Fines and imprisonment depending on the severity of the act</li>
<li>Usually intentional infringement required</li>
<li>Significantly enhanced due to compliance with international law</li>
</ul>
<p>70<br />
Technological Protection Measures</p>
<ul>
<li>Encryption tools and ‘Digital Rights Information’</li>
<li>Legal protection against circumvention in compliance with international law</li>
</ul>
<p>71<br />
Challenges of enforcement in the digital environment</p>
<ul>
<li>Online copyright piracy (illegal up and downloading)</li>
<li>Specific measures to tackle online infringements discussed (“Graduated response” (-> three strikes rule) v. “Global license” (-> ISP collects and distributes royalties)</li>
<li>Development of legal online offer of cultural products</li>
</ul>
<p>73<br />
Collective Management of Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Takes place where individual licences are impractical</li>
<li>Collective bodies act on behalf of individual right owners</li>
<li>Additional cultural and social activities -> of those collective bodies</li>
</ul>
<p>74<br />
The Origins of Collective Rights Management</p>
<ul>
<li>France of 18-19th Century: Beaumarchais and others</li>
<li>1777: Foundation of SACD</li>
<li>1851: Foundation of SACEM</li>
</ul>
<p>75<br />
The most important rights administered collectively</p>
<ul>
<li>Performing rights in non-dramatic musical works (‘small rights’) -> grand rights = performance of all dramatico-musical crations: opera, ballet</li>
<li>Rights of reproduction on sound recordings (‘mechanical rights’)</li>
<li>Rights of satellite transmission and cable re-transmission</li>
<li>Remuneration rights (e.g. reprographic reproduction)</li>
</ul>
<p>76<br />
<div id="attachment_1128" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/page-76.png"><img src="http://www.woitek.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/page-76-300x190.png" alt="Forms of Collrctive Management" title="Forms of Collrctive Management" width="300" height="190" class="size-medium wp-image-1128" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Forms of Collrctive Management</p></div></p>
<p>77<br />
Variety of Collective Rights Management</p>
<ul>
<li>Legal status: private vs public bodies</li>
<li>Number of organizations: monopoly vs multitude</li>
<li>Membership: optional vs mandatory</li>
</ul>
<p>78<br />
International Collective Rights Management</p>
<ul>
<li>Reciprocal representation agreements</li>
<li>International umbrella organizations (e.g. CISAC, BIEM)</li>
</ul>
<p>The Advantages of Collective Rights Management</p>
<ul>
<li>Facilitates licensing in case of individually uncontrollable uses</li>
<li>Viable alternative to non-voluntary licences</li>
<li>Increases individual author’s bargaining power</li>
</ul>
<p>79<br />
Challenges for Collective Rights Management</p>
<ul>
<li>Digital technology may entail new forms of management</li>
<li>Globalization trends call into question traditional territorial basis</li>
</ul>
<p>81<br />
International Protection of Copyright and Related Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Rule of territoriality -> copyright law only applies inside the country</li>
<li>Harmonization of national laws through international treaties</li>
<li>Today, system of widely accepted multilateral conventions</li>
</ul>
<p>82<br />
The Most Important International Conventions</p>
<ul>
<li>The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of 1886 (last revised in 1971)</li>
<li>The Universal Copyright Convention of 1952 (last revised in 1971)</li>
<li>The Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms, and Broadcasting Organizations of 1961</li>
<li>The TRIPs Agreement of 1994</li>
<li>The WIPO Copyright Treaty of 1996</li>
<li>The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty of 1996</li>
</ul>
<p>83<br />
The Origins of Today’s Multilateral Conventions</p>
<ul>
<li>1878 Literary Congress in Paris, chaired by Victor Hugo</li>
<li>Foundation of the ALAI and 1882 Congress in Rome</li>
<li>1886: Berne Convention signed</li>
</ul>
<p>84<br />
International Treaties on Copyright and Related Rights</p>
<ul>
<li>Obligations on contracting states to adapt domestic laws -> We protect your work in our country the same way we protect our own work</li>
<li>Principle of national treatment</li>
<li>Guaranteeing of minimum standards</li>
</ul>
<p>85<br />
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886)</p>
<ul>
<li>Several revisions, last revised in 1971 (Paris Act)</li>
<li>Creation of the Union for the Protection of the Rights of Authors over their Literary and Artistic Works, administered by WIPO</li>
<li>Referred to in later treaties (e.g. TRIPs and 1996 WIPO Treaties)</li>
<li>Minimum standards concerning economic and moral rights, exceptions/limitations and terms of protection</li>
</ul>
<p>86<br />
The Universal Copyright Convention (1952)</p>
<ul>
<li>Revised in 1971 (Paris Act)</li>
<li>Intended to serve as a ’bridge’ toward the Berne Union</li>
</ul>
<p>87<br />
The Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms, and Broadcasting Organizations (1961)</p>
<ul>
<li>Jointly administered by WIPO, UNESCO and ILO</li>
<li>First international instrument to address neighbouring rights</li>
</ul>
<p>88<br />
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994) -> TRIPs</p>
<ul>
<li>Links Intellectual Property with trade issues within the World Trade Organization</li>
<li>“Berne / Rome plus” standard of protection (without moral rights)</li>
<li>Specific obligations on states to introduce effective enforcement procedures</li>
</ul>
<p>89<br />
The WIPO Copyright Treaty The WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (1996)</p>
<ul>
<li>Designed to address new technologies and means of communication</li>
<li>Introduction of new ‘right of making available to the public’</li>
<li>Obligation to prohibit circumvention of technical protection measures</li>
<li>Moral rights for performers</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/unesco-the-abc-of-copyright/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keane, M ~ Exporting Chinese Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.woitek.org/keane-m-exporting-chinese-culture</link>
		<comments>http://www.woitek.org/keane-m-exporting-chinese-culture#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woitek Konzal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PhD sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woitek.org/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keane, Michael Exporting Chinese Culture: Industry Financing Models in Film and Television 13 &#8220;The question is then: how is such ‘creative destruction’ occurring in media industries, if at all?&#8221; &#8220;In spite of the success of a few media enterprises, creative industries in China are fragile when compared with the corporate structures and production relations of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keane, Michael<br />
<em>Exporting Chinese Culture: Industry Financing Models in Film and Television</em></p>
<p>13<br />
&#8220;The question is then: <strong>how is such ‘creative destruction’ occurring in media industries, if at all?</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In spite of the success of a few media enterprises, <strong>creative industries in China are fragile when compared with the corporate structures and production relations of Hollywood. In developed economies the mass media are dominated by highly concentrated forms of organization.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In China, the options for development of audiovisual industries are still uncertain and subject to vagaries in national media policy. Media organizations may expand provincially; they may aspire to horizontal integration; but <strong>the bottom line is likely to remain a lack of capital, which forces them to seek out low-cost ways of competing in a crowded media industry.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>14<br />
&#8220;In television industries for instance financial returns on program development and production are extended across, and within new territories. In cinema co-productions and runaway productions are a means of ensuring cost savings.&#8221;</p>
<p>15<br />
&#8220;Globalization by franchising provides a very different model of development, one that is flexible, post-Fordist, and subject to user innovation.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Within the context of globalization, [...] there are four levels of economic activity: <em>economic specialization</em>, <em>de-territorialized production</em> (production of goods in lowest cost locations), <em>partially traded or non-traded services</em>, and <em>routine manufacturing and services</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>economic specialization</em></p>
<ul>
&#8220;These blockbusters and global brand services are often incubated in &#8216;export-oriented, specialized industrial clusters&#8217;. Hollywood and Silicon Valley, which are result of institutionally embedded know-how, produce continuous learning and innovation. The output of these centres targets world markets.&#8221;
</ul>
<p><em>de-territorialized production</em></p>
<ul>
16<br />
&#8220;Outsourced productions in cinema are the most noteworthy example of how international producers seek to minimize costs.&#8221;
</ul>
<p><em>partially tradable or non-tradable services</em></p>
<ul>
&#8220;The internationalized services as such need to partner up with local knowledge, in turn creating mutual benefits and cultural technology transfer.&#8221;
</ul>
<p><em>routine manufacturing and services</em></p>
<ul>
&#8220;it is possible to make products and services at any location in the globe.&#8221;
</ul>
<p>16f<br />
&#8220;The demand for innovation drives the imperative to constantly examine the international market for opportunities.&#8221;</p>
<p>17<br />
&#8220;This leads back to the conundrum of creativity: <strong>how do developing countries compete?</strong> If it is easier to compete in the cultural economy by making local versions of global products—or by acting as a low-cost location for footloose multinationals—<strong>then the specificity of culture is ultimately eroded</strong>. On the other hand, <strong>a focus on the national can have the effect of marginalizing the cultural product</strong> and ensuring that it fits only into a niche culture market, as illustrated by national cinema and world music. The dilemma for producers, moreover, is making a leap into high-value markets: independents located in developing countries do not have the resources to incubate, produce, and market so as to produce ‘winner-takes-all’ branded products and services. <strong>In many instances, new artists are discovered in the margins and expediency drives them or their agents into to the arms of international financiers, often handing over the valuable IP rents in the process.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<strong>Over-bureaucratization is endemic to the cultural sector and works against implementation of long-term business models.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>17f<br />
&#8220;These factors, in combination with existing conventions within the marketplace, notably a propensity to rely on relationships make it difficult for cultural enterprises to generate start-up capital. <strong>Product innovation is therefore more likely to be incremental and imitation is favoured over innovation.</strong> The focus on imitation has led to the success of Japanese and Korean creative industries. Whereas these countries have managed to move to the next stage (innovation), China remains locked into a cycle of dependency.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<strong>The principal financiers of the Chinese film industry are <em>government</em></strong>: direct support for approved films as well as indirect support for co-productions via tax breaks and reductions of expensive red tape; foreign investors: particular in co-productions and joint-venture arrangements; major business enterprises: through revenue-sharing arrangements and product endorsements in film; advertising companies: often through brokering of services such as post-production; and state-owned enterprises: many of these such as the People’s Liberation Army, are in fact highly profitable enterprises with interests in communications.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In 2003 80 percent of revenue from box office receipts came from the 20 imported blockbusters (Hua 2004). <strong>According to official statistics copyright earnings on imported films were 10 times more than those received from domestic productions.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>18f<br />
&#8220;<strong>The politicization of film content, erratic censorship regimes, and the necessity of managing scripts to appease officials, impacts on production investment in two ways.</strong> First, it discourages domestic investors who are unwilling to sink their capital into scripts that are politically doctored; and second, it opens up a private investment market for the more adventurous producers. Since 1997 the partial privatization of China’s leading film studios (Beijing Forbidden City Film Corporation, Xian Film Corporation, Ermei Film Corporation, and Shanghai Film Corporation) has stimulated private investment and co-productions. <strong>Most of the capital investment has come from Hong Kong, Taiwan and Japan.</strong> While the majority of films in 2003 were still produced by the state-funded studios, there was a significant increase in the number of films (Ibid, 32) produced by privately invested companies. <strong>Some of the more notable independent production and investment houses are Beijing New Vista, Huayi Brothers and Taihe Film Investment Company, and Century Hero Audio-visual Investment Company</strong> (Yin 2004).&#8221;</p>
<p>19<br />
&#8220;<strong>The success of China’s film industry and the capacity to create exportable content is contingent on unleashing creativity as much as stimulating finance.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Tarantino has undoubtedly been impressed by the willingness of the Chinese to work enthusiastically for low salaries in contrast to the spiralling costs in other international locations.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;With a population of more than 1.3 billion China’s cinema box office revenue is just 25 percent of that of Korea, whose population is 47 million.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The success of the <strong>Korean new wave</strong> has seen film financing models going on-line, <strong>allowing ordinary people to buy into the movie-business</strong> (Kim 2003). Netizen funds are a way by which (mostly) young Koreans invest in film projects for a return based on the movie&#8217;s success after release.&#8221;</p>
<p>19f<br />
&#8220;International connections are important in order to break out of the cycle of dependency on state funding. <strong>In 2003 more than half of the 140 feature films made in China received substantial investment from government but less than half the number of films legitimately screened in Chinese cinemas in 2003 were profitable</strong>, and as mentioned above, the heavy grossing films were international &#8216;blockbusters&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>20<br />
&#8220;<strong>the average cost of production was</strong> only rmb 3 million (USD362,000), or <strong>0.5 percent of the average cost of production in the U.S.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<em>Cellphone</em> received investment finance from a number of sources with major contributions coming from Motorola, China Mobile, BMW, and Mtone (a Chinese internet content provider). <strong>Motorola invested rmb 4 million (USD484,000), China Mobile rmb 800,000 (USD97,000), while BMW contributed rmb 1.2 million (USD145,000).</strong> Sponsors received product placement and visible recognition in the film promotional messages. For instance, the protagonist of the film—a successful TV talk host who inadvertently left a message from a lover on his new Motorola cellphone—also drives a BMW. In addition, Motorola and BMW’s logo were displayed prominently on advertising billboards. <strong>Music copyright delivered a further rmb 8 million (US$968,000)</strong> (Meng 2004). In addition to securing financial support, the production company (Huayi Brothers and Taihe Film Investment Company), which is incidentally the advertising agent for China Mobile, sought to ensure returns on investment by working with a Guangdong-based DVD maker to produce cheaper legitimate versions in efforts to limit piracy (Shanghai Daily Jan 21, 2004).&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<strong>Television is an industry that employs an army of people in China.</strong> The flow of investment is more dynamic than cinema as the market is shaped by domestic consumption and broadly supported by advertising.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Television stations are still technically owned by the state but they are now allowed to apply for licenses to operate as corporate entities responsible for their profits and losses.&#8221;</p>
<p>21<br />
&#8220;This is not straightforward philanthropy, however, but investment based on <strong><em>guanxi</em> (reciprocal) relationships</strong>.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In China cable television is ubiquitous but the business model remains low value because subscription to the 30 or so channels is under priced.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;the mass audience for television – some 900 million &#8212; is shared among some several hundred stations. The bulk of income for television stations, and for producers, now comes from advertising.&#8221;</p>
<p>23<br />
&#8220;<strong>Digital content industries provide new challenges for investment in the creative industries.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;<strong>Chinese government is investing heavily in video games production in Shanghai and an animation centre in Beijing.</strong> These are joint public-private ventures that draw upon government largesse towards new industry/new economy development in the wake of Korea and Japan’s video games exports. <strong>The government recognizes that digital content industries are growth industries and that they have global impact</strong>; that is, products and applications developed in China can be marketed globally, in comparison to television and film, which is hampered by being nationally specific. <strong>In addition, digital content is invariably produced with the intent of repurposing in multiple platforms: cable, free-to-air, Internet, mobile phone etc.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Until recently oligopoly structures have not existed in China due to the need to control information.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Digital media is especially relevant to user-led innovation. <strong>There is a need to respond quickly to consumer demand and this gives China an advantage in that it has a large consumer base to test new products and applications.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>24<br />
&#8220;<strong>while ideas may be generated in developing countries, finance to commercialize still comes primarily from multinational investors.</strong>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;In order to avoid becoming a low cost location for media production (Miller et al 2001), <strong>China needs to</strong> further develop its own industrial base and to <strong>recognize the importance of intellectual property protection in developing local creativity.</strong> The synergy between creative enterprise and financial inputs into core creativity, R&#038;D, incubation, and marketing now becomes central to meet the challenge of developing export content.&#8221; Not sure about that.<br />
&#8220;how do countries move from a low national production base into competitive export markets? The transition encompasses a five-stage process.</p>
<ol>
<li>low-cost outsourcing,</li>
<li>isomorphism and cloning practices,</li>
<li>legitimate co-productions and franchising agreements,</li>
<li>niche markets and regional breakthroughs,</li>
<li>cultural/ industrial milieu and local clusters can be produced to target high-value exports.&#8221;</li>
</ol>
<p>&#8220;These media capitals (Curtin 2003) bring with them economies of scale and scope, the attraction of foreign investment, the certainty of rights management, and greater network and distribution complementarities.&#8221;</p>
<p>25<br />
&#8220;<strong>Successful exports of Chinese film and television, moreover, are ultimately contingent on institutional reforms within China</strong>, which will bring these five growth stages into synergistic alignment in order to generate greater value and industry confidence.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woitek.org/keane-m-exporting-chinese-culture/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

