no shit

Good, but written by a film buff/festival lover.

“[...] Despite popular opinion, no [film] festival ever makes a profit. They’re all subsidised.”

Sometimes it appears the festival sector has expanded to service the rise in production. Certainly mediocre films seem to find slots on the festival circus with alarming ease.”

Attendance at MIFF: 185,000 (2009?), “the nation’s most popular film event by far.” SFF: 135,000
“New viewing devices such as video iPods and iPhones and the advent of viewer-generated content are revolutionising the way people access an relate to the moving image.”

“Already there is talk of the need for ‘digital film festivals’, where films can be downloaded instead of projected in cinemas. This seems to be missing the point. Film festivals are never just about showing films. They’re about the collective experience, appealing to our instinctive need for gregariousness and sense of community.”

“It’s no accident that the trend towards downloading music coincides with a huge rise worldwide in the popularity of live music. Filmfests, for all their worship of two-dimensional images, are essentially live events—they have more in common with arts festivals than they do with cinemas.”

“But if the programs are larger than they were in the 1960s and 1970s, it reflects the way that audiences have changed. No longer is there a single, relatively homogenous audience that turns out annually to see a certain type of art house film.”

“[...] Watching a film in a festival is not like seeing it in release.” In wide release (cinema, DVD, etc.).

“The sense of occasion, often packed cinemas, the presence of filmmakers, the ability to measure films against each other, significantly enhances the experience.”

“Without distributed titles [cinema, DVD, etc.] the festivals would become more elite. Lacking the drawcards that appeal to sponsors, government and a more general film-loving public, it’s hard to see how they could survive financially.”

“For all the pressures on them—financial, technological, increased rivalry—festivals that respond strategically and adapt to changing circumstances are likely to thrive. The main reason is that independent and art house cinema is in commercial crisis around the globe. Titles that used to be assured of a cinema audience are dying. Because the old release patterns are no longer working, distributors are likely to look to the festivals as part of their launch strategies even more than they do already. And because fewer titles will be bought for cinema distribution, the festivals will retain their core role of screening aesthetically interesting work otherwise difficult to see on the big screen. Festivals will remain a bulwark against Hollywood-led blockbuster aesthetics and homogenisation, an important avenue of discovery where viewers will continue to give themselves permission to take risks, to broaden and deepen their experience and appreciation of cinema.

Barber, L ~ CAL/Meanjin Essay: A Fistful of Festivals (01.08.2009)

category: PhD sources
tags:

I was scared. Very scared. Not in a The Grudge way. Not in a The Sphere way. Far worse. It was a deeply rooted feeling of helplessness. The kind of fear you cannot pinpoint, because you don’t understand it. You don’t know where it came from, but it’s there. So while the credits were rolling, I delved into my brain and rummaged in the furthest corners until I finally understood. I was too young. Far too young. Not last Monday, but when I first watched Terminator and Terminator II. Because Terminator: Salvation is full of references to them – and those were the only films in my life that gave me sleepless nights!

Some references are of that in-your-face kind. CGI Arnie shows up for example – don’t get angry with me, there’s no way you could not know of that “cameo” if you followed the making of the movie at all. A more subtle reference for example is the look and feel of the showdown, which looks and feels just like the most memorable moments of the films that scared the shit out of me when I was 10 years old. And how I love being scared! A couple of weeks ago I spent $300 on skydiving just to feel nauseous and sweaty. Good to know I can get that feeling cheaper.

Knowing you can piss in your pants for $6.50 – admittedly only if you watched the first two Terminators at the age of ten – and feel good about it is one thing. Knowing about the inner values of the film you’re reading the review of is another. But do you really want to know? I didn’t, and I was happy.

But in case you are interested in plot and character development, this beautiful movie might disappoint you a bit. I guess that comes with a screen play being completely rewritten, because the star of the movie (Christian Bale) auditioned for the main character Marcus Wright, but felt more interested in the supporting character John Connor. What would lead to slight friction with an auteur filmmaker luckily (or not) seems to be quite easy in Hollywood: letting a supporting character become the main one and the formerly main character a slightly less main one.

This is how we end up with Marcus (Sam Worthington) appearing, going north (WTF?), discovering he is slightly less ordinary than the rest of the remaining human population, and meeting people who love him straight away. OK, some are trying to kill him, but let’s put it in Baader-Meinhof-Complex Baader’s words: “fucking and shooting is the same!” (End of German accent.) The only problem with the wild love making part is that the only available hot chick – the other one is John’s wife and pregnant, which isn’t one of my fantasies just yet – “is only looking for warmth. Relax.”

And what does the supporting-character-become-superstar John Connor do? He does what a proper supporting character in a war movie does, just more of it: jump around in dirt and mud, shoot Terminators, and keep the morale of the fast disappearing human race high: “if you hear this, you ARE the resistance.” Constantly and repeatedly. Yes, THAT often.

I enjoyed Terminator: Salvation. A lot. People complain about some cheesy scenes – I ignored them. Others complain about a supposedly inexistent plot – who cares? Some wonder where the supposedly psychic little black girl (WTF?) came from – perhaps we’ll have a Terminator vs. X-Men soon, so who cares? And others again complain about early foreplay without the act – OK, that was actually me.

Terminator: Salvation
(2009)

Director: McG
Screenplay: John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris
Cinematography: Shane Hurlbut
Editing: Conrad Buff IV
Score: Danny Elfman
Cast: Christian Bale, Sam Worthington, Moon Bloodgood, Bryce Dallas Howard, Helena Bonham Carter, Anton Yelchin, Jadagrace, Common.

category: PhD sources
tags:

What the fuck? I mean it. In a positive way. And that’s what the title should have been, not What Just Happened. The movie is R-rated in the States anyway (M-classified in Australia, but that’s beside the point). So it’s not like they had to worry about the f-word. In the US they seem to be a bit nervous about kids starting to swear all of a sudden. In Germany kids swear anyway, so it’s rated FSK12 there. Yes, this means 12 years of age. German kids have to learn how to deal with randomness and life shagging you doggy style from early on. Talking about doggy style: who wouldn’t want to go animalistic with Robin Wright Penn anyway? But wait, you’ll say, it’s Robert De Niro being fucked from behind. Now that changes things…

But let’s start before the sex. Ben (Robert De Niro), a very successful Hollywood producer, is just about to deliver the final cut of a highly ambitious, very arteestic studio backed movie: Fiercely. The main protagonist of that movie is Sean Penn (playing himself) and wants to do something “edgy”, the director (Michael Wincott) is a dry English Alcoholic and the studio boss (Catherine Keener) is a dry hot businesswoman. Although Ben can’t get his shit together life wise, he is good at what he does job wise: produce movies. And because he is so good at it he knows Fiercely is going to tank at the box office.

Therefore he does what any clever person in that business does and puts all his mojo into kick-starting the next movie before anyone has seen the previous one. Ok, not all his mojo. Some of it he puts into getting his family back and some he quite literally puts into beautiful female characters. Bruce Willis (playing himself), the star of this next movie, unfortunately turns out to be an arrogant dick and an asshole at the same time, which is quite an achievement if you think about it, is also working hard on draining that mojo. And I haven’t even mentioned John Turturro’s, Stanley Tucci’s or Kristen Stewart’s demands for Ben’s mojo.

What I find beautiful about this movie, beside the obvious, visually well formed beauty, are the randomness of life and life itself kicking in regularly. I’m not an obscenely rich and famous movie producer yet, but sometimes my life today does not seem to be that different from that future life of mine.

Ben, being obscenely rich and famous, is already one of the “30 Most Powerful People in the Industry”. That’s what Vanity Fair says about him in the film and that’s what is really REALLY important! Concentrate on this. It will comfort you. Not while watching the movie, but in your real life. Not because this tells you that you are watching a movie about a larger than life character from a land of dreams called Hollywood and that life there is this tiny little bit more interesting than yours, but because it tells you this: if you are an idiot and throw away anything good life threw at you first, your life will suck. Even in Hollywood.

So go out there and do better.

What Just Happened
(2008)

Director: Barry Levinson
Screenplay: Art Linson
Cinematography: Stéphane Fontaine
Editing: Hank Corwin
Score: Marcelo Zarvos
Cast: Robert De Niro, Sean Penn, Catherine Keener, Bruce Willis,John Turturro, Robin Wright Penn, Stanley Tucci, Michael Wincott.

M/C Reviews

category: PhD sources
tags:

„I’m Canadian!“ This sums up X-Men Origins: Wolverine in two words. Nice and short. But somebody must have thought more is better. So more it is. More love, more mutants, more explosions, and less blood. I’m a bit unsure about how the first three lead to the fourth. But then again, Wolverine takes place before X-Men, X2, and X-Men: The Last Stand, so perhaps the deeper meaning of this movie is deeper than I expected! Reverse psychology! Oh wait… no: my best friend’s ex-girlfriend told me only women understand reverse psychology. So perhaps this movie is for women, not the teenage boys I thought it was made for? Luckily, I went to see this movie with a girl. And yes, she liked it more than me! But perhaps that’s because she is Canadian.

The movie explores Logan’s aka Wolverine’s (Hugh Jackman) very violent past and stretches from 1845 to about 15 years before the X-Men trilogy begins. Logan and his brother Victor Creed aka Sabretooth (Liev Schreiber) fight “back to back” in most major wars on planet earth. In all this violence Logan seems to find a way back to the humanity inside him, while his brother enjoys it more and more. This leads to – surprise – tensions between the two. Logan consequently decides to disappear and lead a secluded life as a near-hermit with a – how else could it be – gorgeous woman (Lynn Collins) in – yes, you guessed right – beautiful and peaceful Canadia. But only until – ingenious twist – his past catches up with him.

In Canada, I was in the movie. I mean in this world that cinema creates between a story, my brain, and my heart. Despite the already impressive accumulation of clichés, I found it interesting and engaging. I enjoyed both the scenery and the CGI. The movie had its own pace and told me quite a lot about Logan’s past and how he became the man (mutant) of the other films. When I saw his adamantium claws I thought the same as his brother: “Shiny!”

Unfortunately this quite polished experience started dulling with the shift towards more action and less story. Clichés became stronger, dialogues simpler, explosions bigger, and CGI worse (though still not bad).

The movie will find its audience. It is rated M, which explains why Kill Bill Vol. 1 has a lot more blood gushing from severed limbs although O-Ren Ishii (Lucy Liu) uses only one blade instead of three. It tries to please as varied an audience as possible, which, I think, it might quite successfully achieve. You don’t have to be a comic lover to understand it and you don’t have to concentrate on understanding the plot, because there is not too much of it – and Logan does not speak a lot anyway. It is an easy to watch film, but it is not a film to remember. And don’t get me wrong; the world needs these films.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine convinced me of one thing: I should go to Canada. It’s a beautiful country. OK, the outdoor scenes were shot in New Zealand. But that doesn’t matter as long as I can listen to this beautiful Canadian accent. It’s very close to Australian actually. But perhaps that’s just my German ear…

X-Men Origins: Wolverine
(2009)

Director: Gavin Hood
Screenplay: David Benioff and Skip Woods
Cinematography: Donald McAlpine
Editing: Nicolas De Toth and Megan Gill
Score: Harry Gregson-Williams
Cast: Hugh Jackman, Liev Schreiber, Danny Huston, Will i Am, Lynn Collins.

M/C Reviews

category: PhD sources
tags:

What is it that you appreciate in life? I like sleep, food, and visual stimulation. In that order. The reaction I always get to the revelation of these deepest and most personal priorities of mine is this: “and what about sex? HAHA…” You’re not being that funny people. Why would I have sex with you if I can look at Megan Fox? I mean, I’m sure you are beautiful on the inside, but the outside? Come on!

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is the opposite. On the outside it’s beautiful, but the inside? But since we’re talking about sex, who cares about the inside? You can’t have sex with a movie you say? Fuck!

Let’s get it over with the obligatory glance at the story. Don’t worry. I won’t spoil it for you. There’s not much to tell anyway. Which leads me to a dilemma: if I tell you a bit of a story that consists of just that bit, do I tell you too much? Will you get angry with me? Here’s the deal: skip the next sentence if you want to experience the story for yourself, with all its ingenious twists and surprising moments.

The good ones win.

Now that the story is out of the way, let’s get to the important bits. How many stimuli can your retinas handle? I mean, we’re not talking about MANY special effects here. The movie is exactly ONE special effect, but all over the screen. I’m not talking Iron Man style; one dude in a cool suit. I’m talking LOTS of machine-dudes wreaking havoc in the foreground, in the background, to the left, to the right, and right in front of you: Megan Fox, who is a special effect of her own.

The good thing about Megan not being on screen all the time is that we get more Isabel Lucas that way. I understand that feminists might not accept my reasoning and that watching porn is more honest in a way. I just haven’t found an IMAX that screens porn yet.

At least, if you focus on the intense colours (no, I wasn’t high), the incredible and very loud sound effects (the soundtrack itself sucks, but that’s a matter of taste), the robots (it won’t get better than that until Avatar), and the female beauty, you might be able to overlook all the supposedly racist and sexist war propaganda. The IMDb forums are filled with hundreds (!) of pages of discussion about a Decepticon supposedly shouting “Jihad!”, “black” robot twins, and the Devastator having wrecking balls as testicles, and the movie only opened yesterday!

Come on people, it’s a movie! Can’t you switch off your brains, enjoy the visuals, switch them back on, understand that you are intelligent human beings and that seeing actors run through the biggest explosion involving actors in film history (true fact) won’t make you enlist into the army?

If you really think you or other people can’t, don’t watch it and stop them from watching it.

I can, I watched it, and I enjoyed it. Not everything in life has to be meaningful.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
(2009)

Director: Michael Bay
Screenplay: Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
Cinematography: Ben Seresin
Editing: Roger Barton, Tom Muldoon, Joel Negron, Paul Rubell
Score: Steve Jablonsky
Cast: Megan Fox, Shia LaBeouf, Isabel Lucas, Hugo Weaving, Josh Duhamel, John Turturro.

M/C Reviews

storyworld

storyworld

“Storytelling is going through an evolution. The impact of new technologies combined with an audience that has more control over its media is challenging everything from revenue models to authorship.”

“The way I write has fundamentally changed.”

“The Concept Of Story Architecture: What was once a single-format design for me is changing. I now consider my process akin to architecture, where storytelling, technology, gaming, delivery and experience design work together to serve the stories I wish to tell. The process starts with the creation of a storyworld bible, a document that provides an overview of the experience that I wish to create.”

“What’s interesting is that story architecture borrows from a number of other industries. For instance there are elements of “beta testing,” where the audience comes in and tests the storyworld similar to the practices of software developers. There is the creation of a storyworld bible, which has similar elements that are found within the game bibles often used by the gaming industry. Finally there are flow and mapping phases that are similar to how Web sites are designed. Overall these design elements are intended to help make the storyworld engaging and social. ”

Cinema has had a good run. It came of age in the last century. And don’t get me wrong — I’m not declaring the death of cinema, I’m merely suggesting that storytelling is adapting for a new century, one in which the world is connected in ways never before possible. But ironically, in order to go forward we are drawing from a precinema past, when the art of storytelling was an experience and its authorship was not held by one but many. A time when stories were freely passed from one individual to another, and along the way embellished by those who told them.

Weiler, L ~ Lance Weiler explains why filmmakers should expand their films into a “storyworld.”

133f
Identity consists of social identity and personal identity.
Personal identity is what a person is, how she got there, and where she is going (Carsten calls it story-telling). It corresponds to the object self.
Social identity is how other people perceive her (which can change). It corresponds to the level of the acting self.
Is this applicable to film? Film sees itself as the 90-minutes-feature, but people’s perception of film is changing: original web series, etc.

134
“Identity is continuously evolving.”

137
Informal and formal institutions “differ from social norms and customs in that they are always supported by sanctions.”

148f
“The fundamental distinction between standard economics and cultural science is the question of the separation between the individual and its environment.”
“Cultural science rejects the fiction of the autonomous individual in economics.”
“This rejection of the autonomous individual has many consequences for economic analysis. One of the most obvious ones in the understanding of the Creative Economy is the understanding of creativity as a process property and not as an individual activity. Standard economics sees the roots of creativity in the individual, which entails an exclusive emphasis on the incentives and motivations for creative in the normative and positive analysis of the institutional framework for creativity. Thus, standard economics always emphasises the pivotal role of intellectual property rights.

150
“Agent identity is an essential difference between the cultural science approach and standard economics. All economic actions are seen as expressions of agent identity, and as actions maintaining and changing agent identity. Agent identity is a determining force of the emerging patterns of social interaction. In cultural science, economic analysis cannot be based on the notion of a universal rational agent.
From the viewpoint of cultural science, different economic systems involve different agent identities.

“Consumption patterns correspond to social identities which themselves are embedded into social categorisations of status orders. Consumption is a process that reproduces social identities, and which gains its creative force in being also related with stating personal identities.

“Creativity involves users and consumers of products as well as inventors and producers.”

Chapter 1 – Landscapes with water are the preferred paintings worldwide.

Chapter 2 – Art is part of human nature.

Chapter 3 – What is art? 12 characteristics of art:
1 Direct pleasure
2 Skill and virtuosity
3 Style
4 Novelty and creativity
5 Criticism
6 Representation
7 Special focus
8 Expressive individuality
9 Emotional saturation
10 Intellectual challenge
11 Art traditions and institutions
12 Imaginative experience

Chapter 4 – Even if other cultures have different art, it is still art. Otherwise we wouldn’t be able to talk about differences, but we would just say it is not art.

Chapter 5 – Can art and evolution be combined?
95
“With the single exception of fictional narrative [...], Pinker argues that the arts are by-products of adaptations, rather than “adaptations in the biologist’s sense of the word,” meaning beneficial for survival and reproduction in the ancestral environment.”

Chapter 6 – Why does fiction/storytelling exist?
105
“Evolutionary researchers want to know why the mind is designed to find stories interesting.”
108
“Pretend play and fiction-making are isolable, evolved adaptations, forms of specialized intellectual machinery.”
114
“Fictional storytelling [...] is an enhancement and extension of counterfactual thinking into more possible worlds with more possibilities than life experience could ever offer up to an individual.”
115
“And it goes almost without saying that a major element of the appeal of modern cinema resides in its capacity to transport audiences to faraway places and to locations in the distant past of future. Especially if they are exotic for the viewer, the setting and background for a film can be vividly remembered long after the characters and plot are forgotten.” Not sure about the second part.
116
“The bard [...] is at once storyteller and also a tribal encyclopedist.”
118
“Stories are intrinsically about how the minds of real or fictional characters attempt to surmount problems, which means stories not only take their audiences into fictional settings but also take them into the inner lives of imaginary people.”
“Direct access to the inner mental experience of the story’s characters [...] is impossible to develop in other arts – music, dance, painting, and sculpture – to anything like the extent that it is available to oral or literary narrative.”
119
“Storytelling is a mirror of ordinary everyday social experience: of all the arts, it is the best suited to portray the mundane imaginative structures of memory, immediate perception, planning, calculation, and decision-making, both as we experience them ourselves and as we understand others to be experiencing them. But storytelling is also capable of taking us beyond the ordinary, and therein lies its mind-expanding capacity.”
121
“Works of literature thus form a point of intersection between the most emotional, subjective parts of the mind and the most abstract and cerebral.”
124
“The meaning of a literary work is not in the events it recounts. It is how events are interpreted that makes meaning. Interpretation, in turn, involves necessary reference to a point of view, which Carroll defines as “the locus of consciousness or experience within which any meaning takes place.”"
125
“The story is not just about an imaginary social life: rather, the author’s palpable presence means that stories are essentially communicative, and therefore social, events.”
126
“The general thesis about the deeper, long-term edification fiction can give us is not seriously challenged by new delivery mechanisms for storytelling. If there was adaptive survival value in ancient, Stone Age storytelling, it ought to extend to our own time and explain somehow the pleasure we get from any fictions – from effects-driven blockbuster movies, TV and cheap thrillers all the way to classic literature [...].”
127
“[...] across cultures, stories do seem to fall into recognizable patterns.”
132
“The basic themes and situations of fiction are a product of fundamental, evolved interests human beings have in love, death, adventure, family, justice, and overcoming adversity.”
“Story plots are not, therefore, unconscious archetypes but structures that inevitably follow, as Aristotle realized and Darwinian aesthetics can explain, from an instinctual desire to tell stories about the basic features of the human predicament.”
133f
“Aristotle argued that “spectacle” – the eye-popping effects of scenery, costumes, and stage machinery (the deus ex machina) that were already in use in the theatres of Greece – was despite its popularity the least important aspect of drama. The most important aspect was an arresting plot, which was the hardest thing for a dramatist to achieve – ahead even of interesting characters and the poetic use of language. In cinema today, it is still the story told that makes the greatest films.”
“Good stories compel our attention. So do good storytellers.”

Chapter 7 – Art is expensive because it shows somebody is so fit he can spare the money and therefore attract the opposite sex (sexual selection instead of natural selection)
147
Eloquence is the combination of: grammar, syntax, word choice, appropriatenesss, coherence, relevance, speed of response, wit, rhythm, ability to toy with words, and originality.
149
“In the sense bequeathed to us by sexual selection’s effects on the evolution of speech, love is poetry’s natural subject.”
156
“The best way for an individual to demonstrate the possession of an adaptive quality – money, health, imagination, strength, vigor – is to be seen wasting these very resources.”
162
“Language puts mind on public display, where sexual choice could see them clearly for the first time in evolutionary history.”

Chapter 8 – art is always connected to a person because it is a presentation of skills and we value skills; art is connected to the artist’s intention, it always has to be seen with his world/time/environment in mind; we don’t value forgery because it cheats the obstacles the original artist had to overcome; Art institutions decide what Art is: ridiculous, Dada challenged this consciously just as any new art form does unconsciously
172f
“Three distinct functions for language in human social life.”
The communicative/descriptive function,
The imaginary function,
The fitness indicator function.
175
“History and culture give us the artistic forms (epics, novels, paintings, poems) in which we evaluate skill and virtuosity, but our admiration of skill and virtuosity itself is an adaptation derivedfrim sexual selection off the back of natural selection.”
178
“Goodman’s idea is that aesthetic perception, in becoming more informed by artistic knowledge over time, can sharpen and mature.”
182f
“Our job is to communicate the spiritual content of life as it is presented in the music. Nothing belongs to us; all you can do is pass it along.”
193
“Authenticity, which in the arts means at the most profound level communion with another soul, is something we are destined by evolution to want from literature, music, painting, and the other arts.”

Chapter 9 – aesthetic values are the way they are, but they could be different; they evolved to their present form (smell is not considered art but sound is, why? Evolution went this way)
204
“Human nature is permanent, [...] but human culture is created.”
206
“Art may seem largely cultural, but the art instinct that conditions it is not.”

Chapter 10 -
4 assertions:
The arts are not essentially social.
The arts are not just crafts.
The arts are not essentially religious or moral or political.
High-art traditions demand individuality.
226f
The difference between craft and art: craft knows the endresult, art doesn’t
228
An actress who tries to arouse a kind of emotional reaction in an audience, exercises craft. If she explores a character, she creates art. (soap and film?)
The beautiful is something that “pleases without a concept” and beautiful objects possess “purposiveness wihout purpose.” (Kant)
235
“The work of art is another human mind incarnate, not in flesh and blood but in sounds, words, or colors.”
“If you are an artist, the most enduring way to achieve a lasting artistic success is to create works of artistic pleasure that are saturated with emotion, specifically expressing distinct emotions that are perceived as yours.”
“Talking about art is an indirect way of talking about the inner lives of other people: that is, oddly, of artists.” Art criticism is “high-class gossip”.
241
“Kitsch shows you notihng genuinely new, changes nothing in your bright shining soul; to the contrary, it congratulates you for being exactly the refined person you already are.
“High kitsch demands solemnity and high seriousness – entirely fake and parasitic. It succeeds not by expressing deep emotions but by reminding you of them.
243
“Preoccupied as we are with tht flashy media and buzzing gizmos of daily experience, we forget how close we remain to the prehistoric women and men who first found beauty in the world. Their blood runs in our veins. Our art instinct is theirs.

category: PhD sources
tags:

Talks about Ari Emanual (Ari Gold from Entourage), über-agent in Hollywood.

Gives a short overview of the 4 big talent agencies: CCA, WMA, UTA, ICM.

Independent ~ Ari Emanuel: 21st century Hollywood mogul (16.07.2009)

category: PhD sources
tags: ,

7
“This project may not engender the kind of engagement it set out to initially generate.” A slight understatement?